A

What model for the south?

A snap survey conducted by Local Interventions Group in Kavre district of Nepal predictably reveals that in average 87% of the public are unaware of the money that the government is spending in their villages for education, health and infrastructure.

In a mad rush to spend off the money just before the fiscal year closes in, 40% of the Nepal government’s budget allocation is spent in the month of July alone; just as the brutal monsoon season kicks in.

The upshot being water pipes are laid overnight that are detached from the source; streets are blacktopped only to be washed away by monsoon rain a day later; politically protected violent gangs extracting government money for projects that exist only on paper; contractors winning dubious bids through hefty kickbacks and all sorts of stories that ought to come about in a corrupt-to-the-bone poverty stricken ill-governed country like Nepal.

There is a silver lining amidst the gloom and doom.

A whopping 80 % of the public in Kavre said they wanted to know how much money was coming into their villages and they would demand government to be transparent and accountable if they knew.

Common hypothesis being people will look after their money well if they feel it belongs to them. Now how do we inform that 80% of the public in Nepal, how do we mobilise them and how do we motivate them to get involved?

Another challenge – how do we make local office bearers become more transparent and accountable? The premise being people will behave well if they know someone is watching them.

Open Government is the answer, no doubt. But how do we deliver Open Government to the people in developing countries?

The elephant in the room in development sector is Open Government. Current conversations in Open Government worldwide is mostly about releasing datasets in machine readable formats, apps and innovation out of data, employment and economic growth, and so forth.

Therein lies a problem for the bottom lot of the developing world, where there is the greatest need for transparency and accountability initiatives in a simple, non-technical package.

Some efforts, like US and India’s joint Open Government Platform that plans to distribute open source software applications to help governments manage and release their data to the public, is a way forward. But even that is not a way out.

Open Government in the south should be about appealing to the lowest common denominator; communities that are a week’s walk away from the nearest road, communities without electricity or internet, communities unaware of their rights to government’s budget allocation. It should simply be about enhancing government’s service delivery by informing the people.

So, we need to discover a new way, newer tools to take open government agenda to the people in the south. Otherwise, in countries like Nepal where communities in poorest districts still forage for food six months a year if they are to survive, releasing .CSV datasets will be as good as a white elephant on a hill.

Photo credit: Bandipur, Nepali Village via Flickr

  • http://techcampglobal.org Noel Dickover

    Great post! One way that has been proven effective is to convene local technologists with civil society participants, along with innovative government officials. We, the US State Department, did this in Moldova in July 2011, which many participants in Moldova believe was an essential step in generating interest in the country for open government efforts. Our process, called a TechCamp, is a highly interactive event that often convenes these groups for the first time in many countries.

    Additionally, citizen generated data efforts should be seen as just as important as government released data. The “We Gov” concept is possibly even more critical in the developing world than it is in places like the US.

    • http://www.localinterventions.org.uk Pranav Budhathoki

      Noel, thanks for liking the article and commenting on it. We have been deliberating on something similar to TechCamp here in Nepal but as you are aware, resources are hard to come by in the south when it comes to convening such sessions. Wwe would be interested in pursuing it with TechCamp Global.
      Pranav

  • http://twitter.com/RahulPaiz Rahul Pai

    Nepal is so poor that even if their government releases open data , there wont be any positive change unless organisations from others countries create a community of developers and give them technical as well as financial assistance

  • http://www.deliaferreira.com.ar Delia Ferreira Rubio

    Excellent post.
    The same problem appears in some regions in Latin America.
    For far-away, poorly connected communities one possibility is to use “radios comunitarias”, which have a regional reach.
    I know the case of RadioVictoria in Victoria, San Salvador. They are doing a great job making information on public budget available to the people living in the municipalities of the region.
    Delia

    • http://www.localinterventions.org.uk Pranav Budhathoki

      Delia, thanks for liking the article and commenting on it.

      Yes, we are definitely looking at radio to reach the grassroots, as community radio is pretty string in Nepal too. And there must be several other tools to deliver open government in the south.

      Pranav

  • http://open4m.org/ Wayne Moses Burke

    Great article, Pranav and unless I’m mistaken, YOU are at the heart of the solution.

    While those of us on the outside can provide assistance and education, it is that 80% of Nepalese that have the power to create a sustainable and culturally appropriate solution to these problems, and as a member of civil society operating in Nepal, you are already doing that work!

    I would argue that the questions you raise are critical for the majority of the planet to benefit from open government and deserve more attention:

    1 How does open government work without technology?
    2 What resources are available for low-tech countries to learn about implementing transparency and accountability initiatives?
    3 How do you empower a local population to engage with their government in constructive and meaningful ways?

    So much of the conversation around open government focuses on use of technology and while technology is both a driving force and an opportunity for change, it must be remembered that at the end of the day, it is only a tool – and not the appropriate one in all cases.

    To my knowledge, there are not yet easy answers to these questions but please share your experiences and work in Nepal, as will no doubt be very beneficial in other countries as well.

    • http://www.localinterventions.org.uk Pranav Budhathoki

      Wayne,
      Thank you for liking the article and all these nice comments too!

      There is another dimension to it.

      The World Bank spent a cool US $ 113 million to digitise Kenya and make it an African darling in ICT programmes implementation. With economic recession and an age of austerity breathing down our necks, is the rich world willing to fork out billions of dollars to digitise the poorer south first?

      Its a battle for us, to convince open data’s international communities of practice, that open data and open government should not ignore the low-tech south because that’s where it really matters.

      Thanks again for good comments, we have checking out your good work in DC.

      Pranav

    • Souvidhya Manoz

      Could few low tech options (already available in Nepal) be FMs/Ratio, News Papers, and TV cable to start with?